Perineal Wound Complications Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Experience of a Regional Cancer Center.

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) results in a large perineal defect which needs reconstruction by a flap or biological mesh. The incidence of perineal wound complications is thought to be higher following an ELAPE compared to conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE). WE aimed to analyze the perineal wound complications following ELAPE in our institution. This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent an APE (conventional and ELAPE) procedure in our institution between 2012 and 2015. We retrieved the demographic data, treatment data, and pathological data from the case records. Reconstruction of the perineal defect after a prone perineal dissection was performed using a local muscle flap. The incidence of perinealwound complications, hospital stay, and time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy was compared between the two groups. A total of 71 patients underwent APE over a period of 41 months of which 21 patients underwent ELAPE. The perineal dissection during ELAPE was done in the prone position in 18 patients and in the supine position in 3 patients. Perineal wound complications were seen in 9 patients (42%) who underwent ELAPE compared to 17 patients (34%) who underwent conventional APE (p = 0.52). The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who underwent ELAPE when compared to those who underwent conventional APE (22.9 ± 3.6 days vs 14.6 ± 1.0 days, p = 0.03). The median interval between ELAPE and initiation of adjuvant chemo was 54 days (range 32-120 days) compared to 50 days (range 30-100 days) in patients undergoing conventional APE. A delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy of more than 12 weeks was seen in 4 patients (19%) following ELAPE. The incidence of perineal wound complications following ELAPE in this study was comparable to that reported in literature. Although the hospital stay following ELAPE was significantly longer than that following conventional APE in our institution, it did not unduly prolong initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Improving the perineal reconstruction techniques and selecting patients who will benefit from ELAPE may help to reduce the wound complications.

Complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancers: can surgery be avoided?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancers may result in complete clinical response (cCR) in some patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of such patients in a tertiary cancer center. METHODOLOGY: Patients with rectal cancer who had a cCR to neoadjuvant chemoradiation were divided into two groups: Group A (n=23) did not undergo surgery, and Group B (n=10) underwent elective surgery. The recurrence patterns and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 72 months (range 12-180), seven patients (30%) in Group A developed an isolated local recurrence. In Group B, after a median follow-up of 37 months (range 12-180) there were no local recurrences. The median disease-free and overall survival was 36 months (range 6-168) and 66 months (range 12-180) in Group A and 36 months (range 12-180) and 37 months (range 18-180) in Group B respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that surgery could be avoided in selected patients with rectal cancer who have a cCR to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. However, until the safety of a non-surgical approach is proven in a prospective randomized trial, it cannot be recommended outside a clinical protocol study.

Signet ring cell histology and non-circumferential tumors predict pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancers.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery is now the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancers and identify the factors predicting the same. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery at our institution from 1993 to 2008. Patients who achieved pCR were identified. Various patient, tumor, and treatment-related factors were studied for their influence on pCR by univariate and multivariate analyses. The influence of pCR on survival was also studied but was restricted to patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 2008, 248 patients with rectal cancers received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Two hundred and twenty-seven patients received chemoradiation and 21 patients received only radiation. Pathological complete response was seen in 32 patients (12.9%). On multivariate analysis, the factors found to be independently predictive of pathological response were circumferential extent of the primary tumor (p = 0.016) and signet ring cell histology (p = 0.001). Among 116 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years, there was a trend towards increased overall survival (75% versus 54%) and reduced local recurrence (6.2% versus 12.3%) in the 16 patients who achieved a pCR compared to those who did not, even though the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The factors that predict a pCR after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancers are absence of circumferential involvement and signet ring cell histology. Pathological complete response may confer an insignificant survival advantage.